What to Expect from the Texas Tech Running Backs

Michael C. Johnson-USA TODAY Spo

Texas Tech has an awful time running the ball last year, let's look at some of the running backs when Kliff Kingsbury was the offensive coordinator and see where Texas Tech should be in 2014.

I know I've done this before, maybe last year, but I wanted to take a good look at what we could expect from the Texas Tech running game, especially because last year was, well, turrible.  It just wasn't good on a lot of levels. This post isn't about blame, it's about expectation moving forward.

Before the year started, I am sure that I took a look at the overall rushing from Kliff Kingsbury's teams as an offensive coordinator, but that was somewhat skewed because Manziel gonna Manziel and run all over the place.  It made things difficult to figure out because Kingsbury did what he should have done, which is let Manziel run all over the place.  Even then, I somewhat thought that Texas Tech would be close to the running backs from Texas A&M last year and it really wasn't all that close at all.

I'd also add that in addition to just figuring out how off the running backs where, I've been trying to think about what would be realistic expectations for incoming freshmen, Justin Stockton and Demarcus Felton.  Assuming they could be the 2nd or 3rd backs, I was curious to think about what was realistic for either or one of them.  So, let's tackle the table first and then get to some thoughts.

Kliff Kingsbury's Running Backs
1st Leading Running Back Rushing Attempts Rushing Yards Receptions Receiving Yards
2013 (Kenny Williams) 125 497 30 264
2012 (Ben Malena) 138 808 18 111
2011 (Charles Sims) 110 821 51 575
2010 (Bryce Beall) 163 870 12 90
AVERAGE 134 749 27.75 260
2nd Leading Running Back Rushing Attempts Rushing Yards Receptions Receiving Yards
2013 (DeAndre Washington) 107 450 34 269
2012 (Christine Michael) 88 417 8 48
2011 (Michael Hayes) 138 727 44 483
2010 (Michael Hayes) 150 629 30 327
AVERAGE 120.75 555.75 29 281.75
3rd Leading Running Back Rushing Attempts Rushing Yards Receptions Receiving Yards
2013 (Sadale Foster) 29 191 18 165
2012 (Trey Williams) 65 376 12 171
2011 (Bryce Beall) 53 311 9 107
2010 (Chris Wilson) 24 122 1 4
AVERAGE 42.75 250 10 111.75

As far as the 1st leading running back, last year just has to be the exception rather than the rule. Quite literally 300 yards less than any other of the leading running back.  The carries are pretty much the average, but the production just isn't there.  I think part of this is that the passing game was in a bit of a bad situation so opposing defenses maybe didn't have to respect the air attack as much and could quite literally ignore Webb or Mayfield or anyone else. There was just so much that they could do as true freshmen.

Thus, the expectation is that this year, whoever starts needs to get 800 yards rushing. That just needs to happen. It happened in College Station and in Houston and that's just the way it should be.  Assuming that it is DeAndre Washington, and I have no reason to believe that it won't be him, 800 yards is the minimum, and Kingsbury has been pretty consistent with that leading rusher and his attempts.  And there's no reason to think that Washington couldn't be a similar threat to what Sims did at Houston. Woof. Sims is really great at what he does, but Washington can do similar things.

As far as the second running back, it's a bit more varied, but I think the average is actually pretty good and Washington was a few carries and yards below the average.  I'm guessing, the thought process was that although Washington was much better, let's not bang our head against the wall.  I'm thinking that Quinton White is the second guy here as he is a change of pace from Washington and Stockton.  Really though, he is the only change of pace as he's a bigger back, or he's a bowling ball, one of the two.  And I'll readily admit, that I'm pretty much in love with White and I think he's going to be fantastic given an opportunity.

As far as the third running back, one of those freshmen is going to fill this role. The fourth running back was largely a bit player, so this is pretty much it.  It is interesting to see the bookend of 25 or so carries by Foster and Wison, with almost a double the number of carries between the two.  If, and this is a big if, Webb is better, and reading defenses on a second level and truly sharing the rock, then those carries could get towards the 50 range and I'd be completely happy with that.

Alright, you have the figures, tell me what you think. Let's do this.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Viva The Matadors

You must be a member of Viva The Matadors to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Viva The Matadors. You should read them.

Join Viva The Matadors

You must be a member of Viva The Matadors to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Viva The Matadors. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9347_tracker